Data Tool
Packaging Comparator
Side-by-side comparison of packaging materials across CO2 footprint, decomposition time, cost, and water usage. Data sourced from peer-reviewed lifecycle assessments. Every number cited.
Select materials to compare (up to 4):
Performance overview
Higher score = better performance (normalised across all materials). Environmental impact axes (CO2, decomposition, water) are inverted so lower actual values score higher.
Sugarcane Bagasse
Made from sugarcane pulp left after juice extraction. Bhumi's primary material. Commercially compostable in 45 -- 90 days.
CO2 data: Witten et al. (2020), Bioresource Technology
PLA (Bioplastic)
Requires industrial composting at 58°C+. Will not break down in home composting or landfill in any reasonable timeframe. Often mislabelled as simply "compostable".
CO2 data: Vink et al. (2020), Industrial Biotechnology
Conventional Plastic (PET/PP)
Benchmark material. Widely recyclable but only 9% of plastic ever produced has actually been recycled (Geyer et al., 2017). Landfill lifespan: 500 -- 1000 years.
CO2 data: PlasticsEurope Eco-profiles (2022)
Methodology: CO2 values represent kg CO2e per kg of packaging material (cradle-to-grave lifecycle assessment). Decomposition values assume optimal conditions (industrial composting at 58°C for compostable materials; open environment/landfill for conventional plastic). Cost index uses conventional plastic as benchmark (100). Water usage represents production process water consumption. All data sourced from peer-reviewed lifecycle assessments published 2020 -- 2023. Contact us to challenge any figure.